Entry #3 CNN "Violent" Article Analysis

 For this blog post, I stumbled upon an interesting example of slanted reporting in this article from CNN. It really highlights the importance of understanding media bias and its impact on an audience. CNN removes description of Wisconsin protests as “violent” (studentnewsdaily.com)

This article is about CNN removing a description of the Wisconsin protests as "violent." This incident sheds light on the rhetoric used by media outlets and the potential uses of biased reporting. The report begins by stating that CNN had included the word "violent" in their article about the protests in Wisconsin but eventually removed it without any explanation. This raises a lot of questions about the credibility of the source because it shows a lack of accountability for their own reporting. It also opens up the possibility of a hidden agenda behind the use of the word "violent." 

Actual Photo from Riot. Photo Credit Unknown.

If were going to have an analysis of the rhetoric used in the report it reveals that the author uses phrases such as "so-called peaceful protest" and "political battle" to describe the situation. These language choices have a subtle tone of dismissal and downplay the seriousness of the protests. It's obvious the report is trying to put the protests as a political disagreement rather than an actual outcry against police brutality and racial injustice.

The report also includes a quote from the governor of Wisconsin, stating that the protests have been "mostly peaceful" but also mentioning instances of violence. This seemingly balanced statement is then followed by a quote from the Trump administration, criticizing the governor's handling of the protests. This big comparison of quotes really adds to the biased tone of the report, as it shows a difference of opinion between the two parties involved.

As people, it is really crucial for us to understand the impact of media bias on our perception of current events. Biased reporting like this can shape our understanding of a situation and influence our opinions. In this case, the usage of the word "violent" may lead to a misunderstanding of the severity of the protests and give an impression that they are not as legitimate as they seem.

Though, biased reporting can also impact the credibility of a news source. In this example, CNN's removal of the word "violent" from the article raises questions about their journaling credibility. It shows that they are willing to alter their reporting to fit a certain narrative, rather than presenting the facts objectively.

In conclusion, this example of reporting from CNN highlights the need for media consumers to be critical and good judgment in their consumption of news. Its really important to research and fact-check information from various sources to prevent falling into the trap of biased reporting. As people of this country, it is our responsibility to be well aware of media bias to have an understanding of current events.